Research

The research behind Fulcrum.

Fulcrum began with a question most supply-chain risk practice avoids: can risk be induced deliberately, and can market data show where the leverage sits? The answer became a framework, a case study, and eventually a platform.

The original research

A framework for induced risk.

Fulcrum is developed by Synthetic Risk LLC. The research began at Charles University with a question most supply-chain risk practice avoids: if an actor wanted to induce risk, where would they apply pressure, and how would the effect propagate? It focused on critical raw materials: concentrated, hard to substitute, and politically exposed.

The framework groups pressure into five vectors: physical denial, cyber intrusion, sovereign and contractual risk, policy-driven dumping, and political instability. It treats price, volatility, and market behavior as evidence of stress, then looks for leverage points across upstream, midstream, and downstream flows.

  1. 01
    Observe. Read price, volatility, and market behavior as evidence of stress.
  2. 02
    Locate. Find leverage points across upstream, midstream, and downstream flows.
  3. 03
    Attribute. Ask which actors and paths could produce the pattern, and what evidence would distinguish a shock from a campaign.

The contribution is the lens, not the list. The framework does not claim that every pressure is intentional.

Read the thesis (PDF)

The UKTMP case

A qualitative case, before the platform.

The UKTMP case study, “Leveraging Risk in Kazakh Magnesium and Titanium Supply-Chains” (2025), applied the qualitative framework to Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant (UKTMP) JSC. It used open-source intelligence only, with an illustrative aerospace offtaker as the problem owner. It preceded the platform: no forecasting stack, no graph, no cost bridge.

The case identified three primary vectors and several sub-vectors: margin pressure, customer dependence, supplier diversification, Trans-Caspian route infrastructure, payment timing, and sanctions-compliance risk. It asked where leverage sits, which dependencies matter, and how pressure would propagate.

Company
UKTMP JSC
Location
Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan
Method
Qualitative, OSINT only
Platform
Pre-stack

It is the origin case. The current platform came later; the Hormuz/Uniper case is the platform case. UKTMP shows the framework can be applied analytically without the software. It is illustrative and does not claim UKTMP’s or the offtaker’s actual exposure. The case study is available on request.

Documents

Read the source.

The thesis is published in full. The UKTMP case study is available on request. Previews load only when requested, so the PDF does not weigh down the page.

Thesis · 2024

A Framework to Weaponize Risk

Targeting an opponent’s supply-chain vulnerabilities. Charles University, Department of Security Studies.

PDF · 4.6 MB

Preview

Case study · 2025

Leveraging Risk in Kazakh Magnesium and Titanium Supply-Chains

The qualitative UKTMP case study. The public copy is available on request.

On request

References

Sources and further reading.

Public references for the method and the case work. Case-specific artifacts and hashes live with the case.

  1. European Commission, “Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials…,” Mar. 2023. CELEX 52023PC0160.
  2. European Commission, “Study on the critical raw materials for the EU, 2023—Final report,” Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. doi: 10.2873/725585.
  3. S. Carrara et al., “Supply chain analysis and material demand forecast in strategic technologies and sectors in the EU—A foresight study,” JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 31437 EN, 2023. JRC.
  4. A. Sherwood, “A Framework to Weaponize Risk: Targeting an Opponent’s Supply-Chain Vulnerabilities,” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Security Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague, 2024.
  5. U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Strait of Hormuz LNG chokepoint note.” EIA.

Next step

Bring us the supply chain.

We will tell you whether the research applies, what evidence we need, and what the first product would contain.